New Members???

topic posted Mon, June 21, 2004 - 4:09 PM by  howie
i remember the days when we only had 4-5 members, (speaking of which, anyone know WTF happened to Beth?) so it's cool we've ballooned to 22.

please introduce yourselves if you want...after all this tribe thing is as much creating a network of people as well as sharing ideas.

also, i've found anyone linking themselves to Foucault is either a pretentious intellectual buffoon or a crazed sociopath. i fit into the former.

also, anyone wanting to add my to their "friends list" is more than welcome since i have no friends. i know...i've had a tough life.

~hjh.
posted by:
howie
Los Angeles
  • Good Starter question

    Mon, June 21, 2004 - 4:12 PM
    how/when/why the hell did ya'll come across Foucault?

    i'm guessing most of us were introduced to him in college?

    english 101 for me...then later in critical cinema studies, then again in some modern lit discourse class.
    • Re: Good Starter question

      Tue, June 22, 2004 - 9:03 AM
      grad school...i was a psychology major...then i read a biography...a couple of weeks ago i found, yes found, discipline and punishment on top of a public garbage can (in San francisco people leave books on tops of garbage cans...it's a thing so's we can all share..I cannot say that i am 'intellectual' though perhaps a buffoon when it comes to philosophy HOWEVER i keep reading, attempting to understand human nature and put it into practice in my work.
    • Re: Good Starter question

      Tue, June 22, 2004 - 9:30 AM
      I came across Foucault's thought through Deleuze and Guattari's books, *L'Anti-Oedipe* and *Mille Plateaux*.
      I was a high school student at the time, so I lacked the proper philosophical background to understand the subtleties of Foucault's arguments (or D&G's for that matter!). Yet, I was struck by his analysis of the interplay between knowledge, norm, and power, and helped me to understand why authoritarian schemes are so difficult to overcome, power relationships being more diffuse, pervasive and integrated that we imagine. Quite an impressive, overwhelming nietzschean vision for a young girl.
      I haven't read him since I majored in Philosophy, though. I know, I should.
      • Re: Good Starter

        Wed, June 23, 2004 - 11:42 AM
        I started hanging out with the Postgrad people and getting
        their reading assignments...foucault hadn't hit my grad school,
        and didn't fall into any class...I think he's made the survey
        courses by now, no?

        In our organized discourse the professor lumped all
        structuralists and desctructuralists together...people
        who care. Very droll. But artists, by definition, perhaps
        not by practice, are all constructivists.

        Things have to be made easier for Artists! was our school slogan.

        Foucault got me invited into the postgrad program though!
        • Re: Good Starter

          Thu, June 24, 2004 - 6:21 PM
          Introduced to Foucault in a course at Berkeley: "History of Anthropological Thought" while getting my degree. We read about his theories of systems and control. I really enjoyed his writings on Prison and looked into his works on my own from there.
  • Re: New Members???

    Thu, August 19, 2004 - 4:47 AM
    Hello, I'm new here and appreciate the welcoming question.

    I was introduced to Foucault in my undergraduate years at Simon Fraser. Now I am writing a thesis heavily grounded in Foucauldian theory. My challenge continues to be combining foucauldian and feminist theory. Does anyone know of any feminist critiques/commentaries on governmentality?

    Oh, I will place myself within the pretentious intellectual/academic column

    -t
    • Re: New Members???

      Thu, August 19, 2004 - 6:23 AM
      doing a Cultural Studies MA at Leeds Uni England

      first met M. F through Judith Butler and then read History of Sexuality 1

      use discourse theory fairly heavily
      • Re: New Members???

        Tue, October 26, 2004 - 11:04 AM
        Hey people, I came across Foucault at uni in Sunderland, UK (which is certainly no institution to sing about, but at least the English Lit and Gender Studies departments there in the late '90s were acutely focused on critical-theory, so guess I owe them something). Guess Foucault and Raymond Williams have become something like my deities, but wonder if Raymond Williams' work has ever seriously crossed from the UK to the U.S.?
        If Foucault and Williams had a love child, it surely must be Cultural Materialism, but don't know if Cultural Materialism has seeded at all in the U.S. either...
        Finally, in the current global discourse of post-9/11 binary oppositions (good/evil, Christian/Muslim, new-Europe/old-Europe, security/terror, with 'us'/against 'us'), I reckon that Foucault and Williams' critiques of power and discourse are more important than ever, but haven't seen much evidence of such thinking in the media in the UK. Would I be right in assuming this is just as true in the US?
        By the way, this is my first ever reply on Tribe... how did I do??
  • Re: New Members???

    Thu, October 28, 2004 - 1:56 AM
    Been bumping into Foucault's theories for a while now. A lot of recent work though while returning to school to finish degrees in English & Philosophy. Definitely interested in the Foucault-Deleuze connection.
    • Re: New Members???

      Wed, October 24, 2007 - 4:10 PM
      Hi there, I'm new. Look at my blog for my philosophies. I'm from holland, europe.
      Banged into Foucault years ago with "The history of sexuality"
      I think his books are more actual then ever. Might comment more on that.
  • Re: New Members???

    Sun, October 28, 2007 - 11:55 PM
    You mean this isn't the de la Rochefoucauld Tribe?
    Must have gone through the wrong door.
    I'm not a sociopath (who would ever suspect sociopath of denying that he is a sociopath?) but I'm pretty crazed. Anyone who doubts that can just look at some of my other tribes. I'm naturally superior, so do not require pretense in order to be a natural intellectual buffoon. Perhaps someday they'll add "delusions of adequacy" to the DSM.

    Probably I followed someone here because I though s/he is an interesting person. I dunno.

    BTW Howie, have you heard that the Pillsbury doughboy died? His funeral was at four twenty five for twelve to fifteen minutes.

Recent topics in "Foucault: his theories and applications"